New study suggests intermittent fasting may not deliver promised health benefits beyond weight loss, challenging beliefs about time-restricted eating.

Few things get intermittent fasting fans fired up more than debating the “best” schedule. Some people swear it’s better to start your eating window early in the day, while others recommend waiting until later. Now, new research has a verdict: The schedule you follow actually doesn’t seem to matter.

The notion behind intermittent fasting is simple: eat less for a time, improve your metabolism. The reality is more complex, and a new study finds that some forms of intermittent fasting do not alter markers of metabolic or cardiovascular health.

Intermittent energy restriction for weight loss leads to coordinated changes across the brain, gut, and microbiome axis.

If you’re having persistent nausea, headaches, or dizziness during IF, that’s a red flag that indicates the diet may be throwing your blood sugar out of whack. Diabetics should avoid any kind of fasting diet: IF can cause you to become hypoglycemic, a dangerous condition for anyone with insulin or thyroid problems.

Intermittent fasting (IF) is a structured eating approach that focuses on the timing of when you eat. Research suggests that IF may support

A new study published in Science Translational Medicine suggests that intermittent fasting may not improve metabolic health unless it is accompanied by caloric restriction.

It’s best to plan your workouts around your eating schedule to ensure your body has the proper fuel to get you through your training session.

Isocaloric intermittent fasting failed to improve metabolic health in women, highlighting that calorie reduction, not eating window, drives metabolic benefits.

Intermittent fasting is popular among women, but experts warn that common mistakes can reduce its benefits and affect energy, hormones, and results

A dietitian shared 3 popular New Year's weight-loss diet trends to avoid, from intermittent fasting to the alkaline diet.